With its use, every known disease could be eliminated. If a database of all the known microorganisms did exist it would the greatest accomplishment in the history of mankind. Also, there is no circuit capable of reading resonant frequencies. Then when it read the body looking for a harmful microorganism it would have to read that particular organism's resonant frequency and then compare that frequency to the database before it could determine which organism it was. In order for any electronic device to be able to detect an organismвЂ™s resonant frequency, it would need to have a database of all the known resonant frequencies of microorganisms to make a comparison with. The truth is that there is no electronic device that has the ability to determine any resonant frequencies of microorganisms in or outside of the body. This page has been written to explain how these circuits actually work. As part of a study by Scott, et aZ.(ГўВЂВ™), galvanic skin response (which long has been used as a ГўВЂВњlie-detectingГўВЂВќ device) and pupil measurements were found to correlate significantly (r = +.30).Some manufacturers imply that their frequency generators (Rife Machines) have a circuit that has the ability to detect resonant frequencies of microorganisms inside the body of the user. Because deception traditionally has been thought of as requiring an accompanying increase in autonomic activity, the pupil then may be an observable source of leakage. The majority of research supports the hypothesis that pupils dilate in proportion to a general increase in autonomic activity. Since studies in pupillometrics, a surge of research that attempts to expand, verify, and refute his hypotheses has arisen (see Janisse(6)). A possible source of leakage that has received much popular press but little attention as a cue to deception is the pupil response. Such sources of leakage include facial expression, kinesic body movement, paralanguage, and other modes of nonverbal expression. Ekman and Friesen refer to 11 sources of leakageГўВЂВќ as specific nonverbal cues to deceptive behavior. PROBLEM Recent research by Ekman and Friesen(ГўВЂВ™1 2, has attempted to support empirically claims made by Darwin and Freud that nonverbal expressions of behavior are more difficult to conceal than speech content.

The present experiment was designed to investigate directly the hypothesis that verbally As part of a study by Scott, et aZ.(ГўВЂВ™), galvanic skin response (which long has been used as a ГўВЂВњlie-detectingГўВЂВќ device) and pupil measurements were found to correlate significantly (r = +.30). Deception and pupil size Deception and pupil size

Galvanic skin response readout